BMW R69S custom

BMW R69S custom motorcycle by Ritmo Sereno
I’d be a very happy man if this was the sight that greeted me when I opened my garage door on a Saturday morning. Unfortunately, this is not my workshop; it’s that of Ritmo Sereno in Tokyo, a treasure-trove of exquisite vintage machinery. Right now they’re working on this R69S, which is being customized to a client’s specification. The Munich-built R69S had a long production run—throughout most of the 1960s—and was powered by a 594 cc boxer twin putting out 42 bhp. It was not the fastest machine you could buy, but the engineering was state-of-the-art. The motorcycle magazines were enamoured: in 1962, Cycle World said, “Whatever the BMW’s merits in a contest of speed, it is still the smoothest, best finished, quietest and cleanest motorcycle it has ever been our pleasure to ride. To be honest, we think that anyone who would worry much over its performance-potential is a bit of a booby. The R69S is fast enough to handle any encounter, and it has attributes that are, in touring, infinitely more valuable than mere speed.” Ritmo hasn’t revealed the mechanical modifications yet, but the suspension, bars and exhaust system are new. The bike has also been fitted with revised bodywork including a new fairing, fenders, seat and rear cowl. For more pictures of the original—including some with a sidecar fitted, as was common—check out BMBike’s R69S page.


17 Comments

  1. Jefferson said:
    Saturday 6th February, 2010 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    Putting Ritmo Sereno bikes up is practically cheating. Every one of their bikes that I’ve ever seen is my favorite bike in the world at that moment.

  2. YJH said:
    Saturday 6th February, 2010 at 5:27 pm | Permalink

    Guys, I am joining the club_the first Ritmo Sereno to come to France, can only be mine (and the second too)

  3. Duck said:
    Saturday 6th February, 2010 at 8:30 pm | Permalink

    It is very nice but the only part of that bike that could be R69S is the frame. Again, very nice and I too would love to have it but not related to the write up.

  4. Duck said:
    Saturday 6th February, 2010 at 8:45 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, and the motor and trans…hate it when my cut and paste cuts better than pastes!

  5. Sunday 7th February, 2010 at 4:17 am | Permalink

    BOMBA!

  6. megola said:
    Sunday 7th February, 2010 at 8:16 am | Permalink

    Now that’s one ugly bike. why would any one want to try and race that.BMW the most expensive bike made with the cheapest parts and still using 1913 technology today.

  7. sgeechee said:
    Sunday 7th February, 2010 at 8:56 am | Permalink

    Well, i don`t like the rear section of original frame, but all in all, its a nice bike.
    And asking questions like “why would somebody do this or that” … why not? Motorcycling is all about enthusiasm, and customizing especially, and does not necessarily have something to do with plain rationality.
    Other than that, i think the quality of especially the older BMW types is out ouf question – and if one doesn’t like ‘em, he shall just ride something else. Harley-Davidson for example also uses “old” technology, and the idea behind Moto Guzzi is also not the youngest. But it works, just fine.
    Furthermore, it has to be said that BMW surely has also pushed forward some modern technologies which before have never been used in production bikes…telelever, monolever, anti-lock-brakes (or how is it called in englisch?) and so on. Last but not least – the most powerful inline-4 produktion superbike is also not a low-tech product, i think.
    No offense, just my two cents.

  8. Don said:
    Sunday 7th February, 2010 at 1:07 pm | Permalink

    Very, very tasty!

    People miss the point when they run bikes like this down on grounds of “old tech”. This is a custom meant to be enjoyed for a look and the pleasure of riding something done just the way one wants it.

    If you want a high zoot ultimate go fast, build one. That is not what this is about.

  9. Bowds said:
    Sunday 7th February, 2010 at 7:22 pm | Permalink

    Loving the flowing lines of this bike. The curved pipes match the tank and fairing perfectly. Very nice.

  10. the Scrote from Lanzarote said:
    Monday 8th February, 2010 at 12:20 am | Permalink

    Do we know whether the exhaust was made in-house (one-off) or if it’s available for ordering? That thing looks amazing. The whole machine does!

  11. Stu said:
    Monday 8th February, 2010 at 10:55 am | Permalink

    megola hasn’t been paying attention for the last 10 years (at least)

  12. megola said:
    Monday 8th February, 2010 at 6:15 pm | Permalink

    Yes, I have new bike production cost is 10% of selling price and the remaining 90% is for the glue to stick the emblems on.

  13. j said:
    Wednesday 10th February, 2010 at 1:18 pm | Permalink

    does anyone know a source for that front headlight fairing?

  14. Duck said:
    Wednesday 10th February, 2010 at 3:46 pm | Permalink

    http://www.airtech-streamlining.com/vintage/vintagefairingshalf.htm

  15. tim hanna said:
    Tuesday 18th May, 2010 at 4:48 pm | Permalink

    Love that toaster tank. I had the same tank with the hand-painted pinstriping on a 76 R90/6. Miss the old girl.

  16. Jon-Lars said:
    Friday 23rd July, 2010 at 10:17 pm | Permalink

    Sorry, tim, that isn’t a toaster tank. It’s a plain old /6 big tank.

  17. Tim Hanna said:
    Friday 23rd July, 2010 at 10:35 pm | Permalink

    Must be another Tim Hanna. I didn’t make the comment above and have never owned a Beemer. Strictly Norton Commandos for me.
    For what its worth though I love this thing. I have just written a book about a Kiwi rider called Kim Newcombe. He came second in the 73 500 GP championship – beating Ago. Anyway Kim was instrumental in promoting Koenig engines to the sidecar fraternity and Rolf Steinhausen used one to finally push BMW out of sidecar racing. That said in 73 the short stroke BMW 500 engine was still a race and world championship winner in sidecars. (and in 74)You can’t say BMW didn’t push the envelope. Well you could but you’d be pretty dumb.

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Please stay on topic and play nice with your words according to our Comments Policy. If you include a link in your comment, it may take a little while to appear. Enter your personal information below: required fields are marked*.

*
*

Subscribe without commenting