<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kawasaki KZ400 custom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bikeexif.com/kawasaki-kz400/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/kawasaki-kz400</link>
	<description>Custom motorcycles and cafe racers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 17:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desotojay</title>
		<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/kawasaki-kz400#comment-11052</link>
		<dc:creator>Desotojay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 03:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=11278#comment-11052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just wondering what part of the rear shock mounts have been repositioned? I own three KZ400&#039;s, and aside from the addition of a rear loop, and shorter shocks the frame looks fairly stock too me. Just curious.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering what part of the rear shock mounts have been repositioned? I own three KZ400&#8242;s, and aside from the addition of a rear loop, and shorter shocks the frame looks fairly stock too me. Just curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/kawasaki-kz400#comment-10360</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 01:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=11278#comment-10360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I want performance, I ride on a racetrack and don&#039;t care  much anymore what the bike looks like, since I can&#039;t see it while I&#039;m riding it.  And besides, if I&#039;m pushing, sooner or later I will crash.  That&#039;s a fact that will occur on a track.  I don&#039;t want to cry if I crash too pretty a bike.  And for those who say they have not fallen down (or will not fall down) on the track, just wait. If I ride on the street, I want a bike that gives me a strong emotion when I look at it and when I ride it.  I don&#039;t need to go fast on the street.  I just want my senses stimulated, through sight, sound, feel, texture, etcetera.  Bikes like these work because they provide a strong emotion.  I&#039;m sure it&#039;s plenty fast for local backroad duty and handles equally.  Again, with modern sportbikes, the second things get interesting, you&#039;re at triple digits and that&#039;s no place for public roads.  This bike can be ridden likely at a reasonable pace that will stimulate the senses and put a grin on the rider&#039;s face while approaching the bike to get on it, while riding it, and while turning around to oggle it after riding it.  That passes my acceptability test whether it&#039;s a cafe, a bobber, a cruiser, or whatever nomenclature one attaches to it.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I want performance, I ride on a racetrack and don&#8217;t care  much anymore what the bike looks like, since I can&#8217;t see it while I&#8217;m riding it.  And besides, if I&#8217;m pushing, sooner or later I will crash.  That&#8217;s a fact that will occur on a track.  I don&#8217;t want to cry if I crash too pretty a bike.  And for those who say they have not fallen down (or will not fall down) on the track, just wait. If I ride on the street, I want a bike that gives me a strong emotion when I look at it and when I ride it.  I don&#8217;t need to go fast on the street.  I just want my senses stimulated, through sight, sound, feel, texture, etcetera.  Bikes like these work because they provide a strong emotion.  I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s plenty fast for local backroad duty and handles equally.  Again, with modern sportbikes, the second things get interesting, you&#8217;re at triple digits and that&#8217;s no place for public roads.  This bike can be ridden likely at a reasonable pace that will stimulate the senses and put a grin on the rider&#8217;s face while approaching the bike to get on it, while riding it, and while turning around to oggle it after riding it.  That passes my acceptability test whether it&#8217;s a cafe, a bobber, a cruiser, or whatever nomenclature one attaches to it.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kumo</title>
		<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/kawasaki-kz400#comment-10311</link>
		<dc:creator>Kumo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=11278#comment-10311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe it&#039;s not a very confortable bike, but it&#039;s rideable (at least more than other we&#039;ve seen here). A thing is clear, with no mirrors or indicators lights it&#039;s not street legal in Spain.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s not a very confortable bike, but it&#8217;s rideable (at least more than other we&#8217;ve seen here). A thing is clear, with no mirrors or indicators lights it&#8217;s not street legal in Spain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freak power ultd.</title>
		<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/kawasaki-kz400#comment-10212</link>
		<dc:creator>freak power ultd.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=11278#comment-10212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This bike and Woody&#039;s CL350 &quot;brat tracker&quot; are giving me a lot of inspiration on where to go with my cb360. I&#039;ve already got the forty dollar a piece EMGO shorty mufflers. Those swingarms should be slightly adjusted so there not pointing toward the ground. These mid-size (by 70&#039;s standards) jap inline twins are the perfect platform for the street tracker style. Low, narrow and exceedingly maneuverable. Oh yeah, and they&#039;ll stop on a dime. The seat is way too low for anyone over 5&quot; 5&quot;. Something closer to stock height would be preferable. Otherwise it looks like it&#039;d be a lot of fun to tear up the streets with, which is what it was customized to do. Anyone who says this bike is &quot;unusable&quot; is a pompous fool. I know a guy from a local bike crew who&#039;s done four cross-countries on a cafe&#039;d 82 cm400. All bikes are rideable by someone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This bike and Woody&#8217;s CL350 &#8220;brat tracker&#8221; are giving me a lot of inspiration on where to go with my cb360. I&#8217;ve already got the forty dollar a piece EMGO shorty mufflers. Those swingarms should be slightly adjusted so there not pointing toward the ground. These mid-size (by 70&#8242;s standards) jap inline twins are the perfect platform for the street tracker style. Low, narrow and exceedingly maneuverable. Oh yeah, and they&#8217;ll stop on a dime. The seat is way too low for anyone over 5&#8243; 5&#8243;. Something closer to stock height would be preferable. Otherwise it looks like it&#8217;d be a lot of fun to tear up the streets with, which is what it was customized to do. Anyone who says this bike is &#8220;unusable&#8221; is a pompous fool. I know a guy from a local bike crew who&#8217;s done four cross-countries on a cafe&#8217;d 82 cm400. All bikes are rideable by someone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gebeme</title>
		<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/kawasaki-kz400#comment-10200</link>
		<dc:creator>Gebeme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=11278#comment-10200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both were 18&quot; diameter.  The front wheel was a bit narrower than the back.  3.25-18 front 3.5-18 back]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both were 18&#8243; diameter.  The front wheel was a bit narrower than the back.  3.25-18 front 3.5-18 back</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoranholtkamp</title>
		<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/kawasaki-kz400#comment-10193</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoranholtkamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=11278#comment-10193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The KZ400 has the same front and rear wheel.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The KZ400 has the same front and rear wheel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike T.</title>
		<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/kawasaki-kz400#comment-10188</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=11278#comment-10188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My favorite KZ 400 factoid is that the crankshaft rotates in the opposite direction (backwards) from most other bike engines.  I no longer remember the reason for that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite KZ 400 factoid is that the crankshaft rotates in the opposite direction (backwards) from most other bike engines.  I no longer remember the reason for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Object Caching 293/391 objects using apc

 Served from: www.bikeexif.com @ 2013-06-17 23:59:42 by W3 Total Cache -->