<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Norton SS880 Sport Scrambler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bikeexif.com/norton-commando/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/norton-commando</link>
	<description>Custom motorcycles and cafe racers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 17:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tedmen</title>
		<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/norton-commando#comment-6522</link>
		<dc:creator>tedmen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 22:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=10778#comment-6522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Definiltely agree about wishing the new Nortons looked more like the old Nortons. The new ones look too much like Japanese superbikes, yech! Note to Norton: keep the engine, get rid of the funky design.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definiltely agree about wishing the new Nortons looked more like the old Nortons. The new ones look too much like Japanese superbikes, yech! Note to Norton: keep the engine, get rid of the funky design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DE</title>
		<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/norton-commando#comment-6385</link>
		<dc:creator>DE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=10778#comment-6385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Babs is kinda hot...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Babs is kinda hot&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 68 Commando</title>
		<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/norton-commando#comment-6384</link>
		<dc:creator>68 Commando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 04:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=10778#comment-6384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Astro, thats called a Fastback, thats what all Commandos had when they first came out in 1968, including mine! David, the bike looks great, wish the New Norton&#039;s looked like this! Now, if I can just pry that Interpol tank off a friend of mine, my 68 could look close to as nice as yours!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Astro, thats called a Fastback, thats what all Commandos had when they first came out in 1968, including mine! David, the bike looks great, wish the New Norton&#8217;s looked like this! Now, if I can just pry that Interpol tank off a friend of mine, my 68 could look close to as nice as yours!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mule</title>
		<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/norton-commando#comment-6380</link>
		<dc:creator>mule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=10778#comment-6380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this bike has one of the all time greatest tank designs! And the paint makes it look even better. A gold Norton logo on a black background is one of the great classic looks. High pipes? Awesome! A &quot;Scrambler&quot;? Who cares. It NEEDS these pipes!

The shiny forks a problem? What? This bike looks great from end to end. The only way I can think of to improve on this would be to stick the motor in a Seely chassis and give it the same paintjob. But thats just me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this bike has one of the all time greatest tank designs! And the paint makes it look even better. A gold Norton logo on a black background is one of the great classic looks. High pipes? Awesome! A &#8220;Scrambler&#8221;? Who cares. It NEEDS these pipes!</p>
<p>The shiny forks a problem? What? This bike looks great from end to end. The only way I can think of to improve on this would be to stick the motor in a Seely chassis and give it the same paintjob. But thats just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astro</title>
		<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/norton-commando#comment-6378</link>
		<dc:creator>Astro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 09:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=10778#comment-6378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That rear guard is the Barbara Streisand of rear guards.
While looking at the pictures if you hold your thumb over the rear guard it looks fantastic, side covers and all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That rear guard is the Barbara Streisand of rear guards.<br />
While looking at the pictures if you hold your thumb over the rear guard it looks fantastic, side covers and all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Edwards</title>
		<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/norton-commando#comment-6377</link>
		<dc:creator>David Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 08:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=10778#comment-6377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks all for the comments. Akatsuki, rotary motors are big lumps, pretty uninspiring to look at, they run hot and have no engine braking on decel. Not a great motorcycle engine. Josh, rims are modern copies of shouldered Akronts built to better tolerances. Tony, my Norton originally had stock forks with Honda CBR600 cartridge dampers, but the Marzocchis work better. NoH2Oh, nice to be missed, appreciate that. 

Best,
David]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks all for the comments. Akatsuki, rotary motors are big lumps, pretty uninspiring to look at, they run hot and have no engine braking on decel. Not a great motorcycle engine. Josh, rims are modern copies of shouldered Akronts built to better tolerances. Tony, my Norton originally had stock forks with Honda CBR600 cartridge dampers, but the Marzocchis work better. NoH2Oh, nice to be missed, appreciate that. </p>
<p>Best,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jess e</title>
		<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/norton-commando#comment-6376</link>
		<dc:creator>jess e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 06:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=10778#comment-6376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[does anyone else think the sidecovers look a tad wonky?
seems to fight the line.
but nitpicky... considering.  sublime]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does anyone else think the sidecovers look a tad wonky?<br />
seems to fight the line.<br />
but nitpicky&#8230; considering.  sublime</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Object Caching 327/393 objects using apc

 Served from: www.bikeexif.com @ 2013-05-20 00:54:10 by W3 Total Cache -->