<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunbeam S7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bikeexif.com/sunbeam-s7/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/sunbeam-s7</link>
	<description>Custom motorcycles and cafe racers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 17:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattro</title>
		<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/sunbeam-s7#comment-4721</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 14:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=6698#comment-4721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[that brake lever is interesting -- inverted fulcrum and in-bar wiring? i&#039;m SO stealing that!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that brake lever is interesting &#8212; inverted fulcrum and in-bar wiring? i&#8217;m SO stealing that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Lenson</title>
		<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/sunbeam-s7#comment-2649</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Lenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=6698#comment-2649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Correction to my previous posting.........it was a S7 Deluxe 1956 vintage. The S8 was the same thing really but did not look as nice as the fat tyred S7.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction to my previous posting&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;it was a S7 Deluxe 1956 vintage. The S8 was the same thing really but did not look as nice as the fat tyred S7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Lenson</title>
		<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/sunbeam-s7#comment-2648</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Lenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=6698#comment-2648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had a S8 Deluxe in the late sixties, used to ride it to the where I did my apprenticeship at Henly Beach in South Austarlia.  Yes I agree with some previous comments about reliability especially the ignition, and the generator, but I could always get it going regardless. Rode it in all conditions for three years until I could afford a 700 Royal Enfield. The Enfield made the poor old Sunbeam seem like it had come out of the Ark. Yet after all these years the Sunbeam still has a charm that no other bike I have ridden has, wish I still had it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a S8 Deluxe in the late sixties, used to ride it to the where I did my apprenticeship at Henly Beach in South Austarlia.  Yes I agree with some previous comments about reliability especially the ignition, and the generator, but I could always get it going regardless. Rode it in all conditions for three years until I could afford a 700 Royal Enfield. The Enfield made the poor old Sunbeam seem like it had come out of the Ark. Yet after all these years the Sunbeam still has a charm that no other bike I have ridden has, wish I still had it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kim scholer</title>
		<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/sunbeam-s7#comment-2621</link>
		<dc:creator>kim scholer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=6698#comment-2621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The system the newer Harleys use is much like the Norton Isolastic system. A bit improved, of course, but with the engine/driveline isolated from the frame and front end.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The system the newer Harleys use is much like the Norton Isolastic system. A bit improved, of course, but with the engine/driveline isolated from the frame and front end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Webster</title>
		<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/sunbeam-s7#comment-2620</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=6698#comment-2620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And of course, another vibration monster, the Harley Davidson Sportster introduced the &quot;revolutionary&quot; idea of rubber mounting the engine about five years ago. I&#039;ve no idea how it worked, but my friend had an earlier model which vibrated so insanely that everything had to be wired and loctited on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And of course, another vibration monster, the Harley Davidson Sportster introduced the &#8220;revolutionary&#8221; idea of rubber mounting the engine about five years ago. I&#8217;ve no idea how it worked, but my friend had an earlier model which vibrated so insanely that everything had to be wired and loctited on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kim scholer</title>
		<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/sunbeam-s7#comment-2619</link>
		<dc:creator>kim scholer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=6698#comment-2619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BMW R27 (1960-66) and Swiss military Condors with Ducati engines (1960s through 70s) used rubber mounting too. Anyone else out there know something?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BMW R27 (1960-66) and Swiss military Condors with Ducati engines (1960s through 70s) used rubber mounting too. Anyone else out there know something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Webster</title>
		<link>http://www.bikeexif.com/sunbeam-s7#comment-2618</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=6698#comment-2618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another thing I remember about my Sunbeam was that you had to adjust the rubber &quot;snubbers&quot; that acted as an engine steady and balance against torque reaction. Unless you got them dead right, the whole bike vibrated in a horrible fashion. Once adjusted correctly, the engine was one of the smoothest i have ever experienced.  Low power equalled tractability and smoothness. The lower powered Triumphs were the same - 3TAs, 5TAs, T100As etc.  I think twins of this era lose their smoothness with higher outputs.  Norton solved that by isolating the engine from the frame, and the Sunbeam had a similar ingenious scheme some 15 years earlier.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thing I remember about my Sunbeam was that you had to adjust the rubber &#8220;snubbers&#8221; that acted as an engine steady and balance against torque reaction. Unless you got them dead right, the whole bike vibrated in a horrible fashion. Once adjusted correctly, the engine was one of the smoothest i have ever experienced.  Low power equalled tractability and smoothness. The lower powered Triumphs were the same &#8211; 3TAs, 5TAs, T100As etc.  I think twins of this era lose their smoothness with higher outputs.  Norton solved that by isolating the engine from the frame, and the Sunbeam had a similar ingenious scheme some 15 years earlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Object Caching 327/393 objects using apc

 Served from: www.bikeexif.com @ 2013-05-24 09:24:03 by W3 Total Cache -->