Comments on: TriBSA 750: ‘The Bitch’ http://www.bikeexif.com/tribsa-motorcycle Custom motorcycles and cafe racers Sun, 13 Feb 2011 17:35:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Nige http://www.bikeexif.com/tribsa-motorcycle#comment-8705 Nige Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:04:17 +0000 http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=5541#comment-8705 Adrian,

Both the T150 and Rocket 3 were triples……………This is not only a twin but is also in a BSA frame so what exactly are you on about?

]]> By: Erik Knudsen http://www.bikeexif.com/tribsa-motorcycle#comment-8674 Erik Knudsen Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:40:31 +0000 http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=5541#comment-8674 BSA frames of the ’60s including the ones for the triples were more rigid than Triumph frames and provided better handling with the low-profile tires that became available in the late ’60s. BSA frames moved the weight distribution forward compared to the Triumph which also helped handling. BSA twins had bottom end oiling problems and Triumphs didn’t, so it makes sense to put a Triumph engine in a BSA frame. The better engine in the better frame.

]]> By: Adrian http://www.bikeexif.com/tribsa-motorcycle#comment-1620 Adrian Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:31:50 +0000 http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=5541#comment-1620 I have never really understood the point of this bike, when at the same time that the T150 was around, BSA also had the Rocket Three. Was the Triumph frame at that time so much better ?

]]> By: Carson http://www.bikeexif.com/tribsa-motorcycle#comment-1605 Carson Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:23:32 +0000 http://www.bikeexif.com/?p=5541#comment-1605 It’s always great to see original style cafe racers that are more than just a UJM with clubmans. British bikes rule.

]]>